Last month we published the questions used by the National Science Foundation to gauge Americans’ understanding of science. This month we publish the answers -- at least as well as your editor could assemble them. (In parentheses: percent answering correctly among college graduates, sub-sample size n=260.)
Multiple choice questions
Explain in your own words questions
While there is broad consensus that theory building is the primary objective of science, this level of conceptualization is relatively rare in the public and not universal among graduates of science, engineering, or medical programs. The measurement of the understanding of scientific inquiry at this level is compounded by the dual meaning of theory in American English. In the usage employed in the preceding paragraph, we mean theory to refer to comprehensive sets of statements about the operation of various aspects of nature, or the development of models of natural processes. This usage would apply to generalizations or models in the biological, social, or physical sciences. At the same time, theory is often used in everyday language to refer to speculations or suppositions not yet supported by evidence. For example, it is common to hear a person dismiss a speculation by another person by saying that it is 'only a theory,' meaning that there is no evidence, or insufficient evidence, for that conclusion. Ironically, this is almost exactly the opposite meaning of the term as used in science.
Science & Engineering Indicators (12.ed) 1996, chap. 7, p. 9
Copyright 1992-2005, The Association for Rational Thought